Jul 20, 2013

Japanese professor Book confirmed: Fishing Island belongs to China

Murata Tada professor emeritus of Yokohama National University of Japan recently in an exclusive interview with Xinhua news agency said, Diaoyu Island is not inherent territory of japan. The Japanese side in order to strengthen the Diaoyu Islands "nonexistent territorial dispute" view, fabricating false records, and was published in related historical materials.

This year in June, Murata published the book "territorial issues origin", the book according to the Japanese released data, the Diaoyu Island does not belong to Okinawa or the history of the Ryukyu Islands, Japan's inherent territory of the conclusion is not. "According to available information, no one can for me to refute the view," said Murata.

Murata said, Japan said Okinawa county "Senkaku Islands" (i.e. I Diaoyu Islands are Japanese territory), but Okinawa was not inherent territory of Japan, before is the Ryukyu Kingdom, later incorporated into japan. And the Ryukyu recorded history does not exist in the Japanese government said "the Senkaku islands".

Murata said, from the point of view of geographical condition and natural environment, the Diaoyu Island does not belong to Okinawa or the Ryukyu Islands, but has a close relationship with Chinese fishermen. He says, Diaoyu Island is located in the edge of the continental shelf. Okinawa fishermen there are boats, spanning 2000 meters deep in the Okinawa trough to fishing almost impossible. "However, in China's Fujian, Taiwan fishermen's opinion, there is a shallow, history often go fishing, now also often go to."

This year in June, Murata published the book "territorial issues origin", the book according to the Japanese released data, the Diaoyu Island does not belong to Okinawa or the history of the Ryukyu Islands, Japan's inherent territory of the conclusion is not.

Okinawa was not inherent territory of Japan, before is the Ryukyu Kingdom, later incorporated into japan.

Murata also found an important historical facts, that the then Okinawa county magistrate Nishimura Sami suggested in 1885 the Japanese government not to the Diaoyu Islands construction border identification. Murata said, the Japanese interior minister Yamaken Yutomo has asked the Qing Dynasty Village Survey between Fuzhou Okinawa Naha uninhabited island, clear the ownership of these islands, and the establishment of territorial marking. But the village did not immediately executed. "Because he knows, these islands and the relevant." The final hill county ordered to suspend the establishment of identity.

Japan's foreign ministry said on its official website, "since 1885, the Japanese government through the Okinawa county government and the way many of the Senkaku Islands investigation", but Murata think, Japan has never been investigated several times the so-called "". The field survey of Japan on the Diaoyu Islands are only at the end of 1894 10, investigation of Okinawa County staff within hours of the Diaoyu islands.

Murata said, the Diaoyu Islands are Japanese steal in Jia Wu war ", many problems also exist in the procedure, no nor on the international public relation to the Japanese people".

The Japanese government's denial had shelved the Diaoyu Islands issue reached a consensus, said Murata, the Ministry of foreign affairs of Japan in order to strengthen the Diaoyu Islands "nonexistent territorial dispute" view, were published in the relevant historical materials.

Murata also believed that, the two sides should enter into dialogue, common rules to prevent the Diaoyu islands surrounding the occurrence of unexpected events. "I think China has made some efforts in this area."

No comments:

Post a Comment